Hello Addis,
Could you please specify what product and version you are running? I would also like to know what commands you are using to produce the issue you are seeing.
Hello Addis,
Could you please specify what product and version you are running? I would also like to know what commands you are using to produce the issue you are seeing.
Please note, the PowerPoint shown here is a suggested workflow consideration for 08.11.07.xx based Roadway Designer. This approach would not be the recommended approach for 08.11.09.xx based products. The Bentley LEARN Server has some tutorials for the newer intersection design approach with the use of Civil Cells.
This didn't work for me. I have added the command line switch to the target path in the InRoads shortcut pinned to the Start menu and still get the same results. I have confirmed that it is also on the Microstation target path. I then added the created InRoadsAT.CFG file in the System folder without and with the command line switch in the taget paths and still get the error pop up. And now I can not uninstall InRoads!
Please help!
Hello Bruce,
What versions of MicroStation and InRoads are you running?
Hello!
Versions MS 08.11.07.443 and IR 08.11.07.494
Yes a clearance assessment would be needed against a kinematic vehicle envelope / structual gauge envelope
Hello Bruce,
Did you get a chance to verify if the Applications menu was added into MicroStation after you ran the command line switch? Are you working in a workspace? Do you by any chance have Geopak or WaterCAD on your system? Please verify that you are in fact launching the proper licensed product. If you need assistance troubleshooting your License Managment Tool, please let me know.
Verify that you installed the products in order of Prerequisite > MicroStation > Geopak (if it's being used) > InRoads. Also, if you have WaterCAD on your system, there is a change that needs to be made. Please see the link below:
(Posted on behalf of BE Communities Member)
Is there a tutorial or video available for Roundabouts?
Yes, the online seminar, Roundabouts Made Easy, provides an overview of Roundabouts in SELECTseries 2.
The point controls on the corridor modeling is not working as expected. We are getting a zig-zag effect when trying to apply a horizontal point control to a linear geometry control type.
This behavior is usually seen when a user has applied the Feature Name Override option (Point Properties) within their template and that feature exist on both sides of the alignment.
Hi Andrea,
The Applications menu is not being loaded into MicroStation. I am not working in a workspace. I do not have Geopak or WaterCAD. I have confirmed launching InRoads (which results on the opening of MicroStation with the error 126 for InRoads unable to load library <DLL or MDL shared Library> CivUstAT). I had originally loaded InRoads prior to MicroStation (our in-house instructions were wrong), however, I then reinstalled InRoads after MS was loaded. I attempted to uninstall everything and "start from scratch" however I can not uninstall or repair InRoads so I installed the products in the above order.
Hello Bruce,
If you are unable to uninstall the product, you may run the following:
support.microsoft.com/.../program_install_and_uninstall
This will allow you to uninstall the product and reinstall it in the proper order.
Hi Tanner,
did you get this sorted out?
I tried to grab your file but was denied access to the site.
If you have not got this resolved, and can get the data to me, I can probably help.
This is not my case, I've tried with a very simple corridor model on SS3 (file attached) and the behavior is the same.
regards,
Juan
Problem solved! Thank you!
Hi everyone,
i use Geopak for my DTM construction and have found that the best way of achieving a 'smooth' DTM is by creating a LATTICE as opposed to a TIN. This is the same as creating a grid as mentioned by MichaelGilham.
Its the best way of removing 'sharps' that are created by the contour data used, without having to smooth out the contour linestrings.
Hi everyone,
i use Geopak for my DTM construction and have found that the best way of achieving a 'smooth' DTM is by creating a LATTICE as opposed to a TIN. Its the best way of removing 'sharps' that are created by the contour data used, without having to smooth out the contour linestrings.
Juan,
You do realize you can also just select the component(s) and get volume info directly from the Element Information dialog, under the section called "Geometry"? This obviously is not reportable but at least will allow you to get a quick number...